#Torchat unsafe code

How is retroshare solving this, that you hide from your trusted friends? or you can deny your friends, even if you trust them? jabber2 The same problem has truecrypt solved with a hidden container in a container, to obtain plausible deniability.

The prisoners dilemma or chicken game you know? so 2 friends seem to be private or are trusted by eachone, yes, as long one is not needed to reveal his social structure and is forced to explain the content of transfer. all people with one terabyte traffic get an hard disc check or IP check at the ISP, then you can search as well all your friends connections and hard disks.

What, if that would be introduced as well for traffic?, e.g. substance you are not allowed to order bigger tons.

Let me give an example: from certain chem. And the firewall problem is as well given (for i2p) or solved (for retroshare) or both?.īut how is retroshare secure from revealing all the social network contacts each one has? To be abstract, I2p does not need a chat system. Bob, you said i2p will help retroshare to connect through a firewall (you meant that for the case of a retroshare with base-64-keys?) but how then is the problem solved, that i2p needs a port in the firewall?Īnd how would be the DHT organized? as well over i2p or is that not needed because of i2p searching the base-64-keys? So the only point is: the firewalled users. (with zero or more hops) then there is no need to forward retroshare ports. In the end we then need to forward in the router only the i2p port of SAM (hope this can be any port), and then retroshare´s layer is done over base-64-keys over i2p. The only problem of course is, that retroshare has no menpower to build this in and second, that i2p, as far as I know, is not able to run behind every firewall (if that is right), which tor can do with hidden services! If zero Hops is then default, you have no performance loss to the now given system.ī) retroshare would be able to solve firewalled users problems (as you posted once)Ĭ) users can hide the social network peers from ISP monitoring (for the hard disk they need retrolocal in truecrypt of course)ĭ) The Tor Chat Messenger System is not obsessing i2p why not a base-64 retroshare in general, without any direct IP adress? all over i2p-SAM, in which you can decide to hide 0, 1 or 2,3 hops from the friend. I know, this is not on the tasklist now, just wanted to state the state of discussion here. If you then have for SAM a slider, to set 1,2 or 3 hops to the rendevous point (which is your direct friend, if not covered as well) you even could release to friends with an anonymous/foreign IP. If the other is doing this as well (Zero i2p SAM hops), this would allow to have direct contacts with retroshare as now it is. You then can choose, if you want to use direct IP connections to the rendevous point of i2p-SAM or to use 1,2,3 hops to be covered with your IP. Maybe it is useful, to have a SAM implementation in retroshare as a general base. This means: it is like freezing a see, one point freezes and then all ice stars will hop to the nearby water.Ī) an anonymous chat system will come some day for the development in i2p so or so andī) that retroshare is very well, if there is an option to hide the IP adresses of your destination (not neighbour), you send traffic to. Then they have all your friends by method a and b. This must not be a problem, if you have trusted friends.īut there might be the case, that you get in the situation to explain your heavy traffic. Retroshare has (in general) the disadvantage, that you reveal your social network,Ī) by the collected pqi certificates on your the hard discĬ) by heavy traffic, you need to explain (e.g. Furthermore Tor cannot handle massive file transfer, which is retroshare/i2p too. the encryption is more along the line and more secure (second channel key transfer) than end to end encryption, and in Tor you have at the rendevouspoint as well an unencrypted handshake (!). I think the i2p network is the better oneĪnd there was also the conclusion, that retroshare over i2p would cover most needsĮ.g.

#Torchat unsafe code

Hi there was a long and good talk with a chat developer, who wants to code a messenger to chat anonymously, the Tor system should be considered for that plans.